After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are reviving these kinds of systems. Coming from lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the border to a program for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being applied to asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series www.ascella-llc.com of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs the capacity to run these systems and to go after their right for safeguards.
It also illustrates how these types of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from accessing the channels of cover. It further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of those technologies, by which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article states that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double effect: whilst they help to expedite the asylum procedure, they also produce it difficult for refugees to navigate these systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.